Scientific Approaches to Studying the Role of Modern Technologies in International Relations

Authors

  • Vasyl Baranets Postgraduate student of the Department of International Relations and Public Communications of the Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University Author https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8096-5821
  • Ivan Osadtsa Associate Professor of the Department of International Relations and Public Communications, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5593-5944

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mediaforum.2024.15.155-170

Keywords:

technology, neural networks, artificial intelligence, decision-making, international relations, international relations theory, digital transformation of the public sphere

Abstract

Over the past decade, several technological “quantum leaps” have simultaneously reshaped both international politics and the scholarly interpretation thereof. Contemporary debates concerning the incorporation of technology into the analysis of international relations point to three interrelated major trends. The first trend challenges the prevailing technological determinism and the practice of treating technology as a discrete variable that remains “outside” the core discussion. The second trend reflects a heightened emphasis on theoretical constructs derived from the sociology of technology and science. The third trend involves a methodological shift toward qualitative, empirically grounded field research.

This article proposes examining the societal challenges posed by artificial intelligence from the perspective of long-term sociotechnical transformation, in order to hypothesize which changes might ensue from society’s “use” of these technologies. In contrast to most current social science debates focusing on near-term effects and risks, our approach centers on the normalization processes of artificial intelligence over a longer horizon. Much like the gradual integration of mechanical time measurement into everyday life, this normalization unfolds as a (often contested) interplay between technological capabilities and the social consequences anticipated to arise from them. The subsequent analysis concentrates on the realm of social self-organization, namely democratic practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

The Whitehouse (2016) The Administration’s Report on the Future of Artificial Intelligence. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/10/12 /administrations-report-future-artificial-intelligence

Scott B., Heumann S., and Lorenz P. (2018) Artificial intelligence and foreign policy. Stiftung Neue Verantwortung Policy Brief. https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/ai_foreign_policy.pdf

BABAJIDE A. J. (2024) Transformative role of artificial intelligence in global communication: minimising misinformation, disinformation, cultural diversity and fostering global understanding. https://journals.lasued.edu.ng /index .php/LAJOCSE/article/view/97/103

Mazarr M.J. et al. (2018) Understanding the Emerging Era of International Competition: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2726.html

Kurbalija J (2017) The impact of (big) data on geopolitics, negotiations, and the diplomatic modus operandi. Diplo blog, 19 May. 39. https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/impact-big-data-geopolitics-negotiations-and-diplomatic-modus-operandi

German Federal Government (2018) Artificial Intelligence Strategy. https://www.ki-strategie-deutschland.de/home.html

Heumann S. (2018) Nationale KI-Strategien in EU und USA: Wie positioniert sich die KI-Enquete? https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/folien _heumann_ki_enquete.pdf

Strategic Council for AI Strategy (2017) Artificial Intelligence Technology Strategy, https://www.nedo.go.jp/english/activities/ZZCA_100014.html

United Nations (2018) UN Secretary-General’s Strategy on New Technologies. http://www.un.org/en/newtechnologies/images/pdf/SGs-Strategy-on-New-Technologies.pdf

Friend T. (2018) How frightened should we be of A.I.? The New Yorker, 14 May. https://www.newyorker.com/ magazine/2018/05/14/how-frightened-should-we-be-of-ai

Bjola C. (2021) Trends and Counter-Trends in Digital Diplomacy. https://www.swp- berlin.org/publications/products/arbeitspapiere/WP_Diplomacy 21_No18_Corneliu_Bjola.pdf

Wagner D. and Furst K. (2018) AI and the international relations of the future. International Policy Digest blog, 12 August. https://intpolicydigest.org/2018 /08/12/ai-and-the-international-relations-of-the-future

Brown J. & Lorenz P. (2017). The Future of Work and the Trans-Atlantic Alliance. Bertelsmann Foundation North America, Washington, D.C. and Stiftung Neue Verantwortung, Berlin. Available at: https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/the_future_of_work_the_trans.pdf.

König P. D. & Wenzelburger G. (2021), Between technochauvinism and human‑centrism: Can algorithms improve decision‑making in democratic politics?, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41304-020-00298-3

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Baranets, V., & Osadtsa, I. (2024). Scientific Approaches to Studying the Role of Modern Technologies in International Relations. Mediaforum : Analytics, Forecasts, Information Management, 15, 155-170. https://doi.org/10.31861/mediaforum.2024.15.155-170