LEXICO-SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC-STYLISTIC DEVICES IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF BETH ANN STANTON'S IMAGE IN THE SCREENPLAY "WHY WOMEN KILL": A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/gph2026.858-859.156-167

Keywords:

media linguistics, character image, psycholinguistic discourse analysis, Nurturer archetype, euphemism, aposiopesis, screenplay

Abstract

The article presents a psycholinguistic analysis of Beth Ann Stanton’s speech in the screenplay of the television series “Why Women Kill” (2019) by M. Cherry. The study establishes systematic correlations between the character’s lexico-semantic and syntactic-stylistic devices and the archetypal characteristics of The Nurturer as defined by V. L. Schmidt’s classification. The methodological framework integrates psycholinguistic discourse analysis, media narrative linguistics, and archetypal character theory. The research corpus comprises 317 contextualised dialogue instances extracted by continuous sampling from complete screenplay transcripts of the first season. Application of descriptive method, contextual analysis, and quantitative calculation revealed 56 lexico-semantic and 47 syntactic-stylistic units distributed across 103 word forms, demonstrating a stylistically differentiated speech profile of the character. Among lexico-semantic devices, euphemism dominates (21.43%), performing protective semantic softening of traumatic realities across several thematic domains. Hyperbole (16.07%) and metaphor with simile (8.93% each) form the emotionally rich discourse. The lexical level also features 31 politeness markers constructing the character’s communicative identity as an ideal hostess. At the syntactic level, aposiopesis prevails (53.19%) as a performative realization of psychological uncertainty and reflexivity. Rhetorical questions (17.02%) function as indirect persuasion devices. Analysis across three thematic dimensions – care, loss, and protection of the vulnerable – confirms the systematic correlation between speech patterns and the key characteristics of The Nurturer archetype. The findings substantiate the effectiveness of a corpus-discourse approach to screen character analysis and contribute to media linguistics methodology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albota, S. M. (2016). Symvol vs obraz: Do pytannia terminolohichnoi variatyvnosti [Symbol vs image: On the question of terminological variability]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia: Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii, 842, 107–110.

Berezhna, M. V. (2019). Henderna reprezentatsiia u mediadyskursi: Linhvistychnyi vymir [Gender representation in media discourse: A linguistic dimension]. Hermanska Filolohiia, 31(2), 45–62.

Berezhna, M. V. (2020). Psykholinhvistychni pidkhody do analizu personazhiv u vizualnykh media [Psycholinguistic approaches to character analysis in visual media]. Chernivtsi: Chernivtsi University. 189 p.

Cherry, M. (2019). Why Women Kill: Complete screenplay transcripts. Paramount Television.

Erlikhman, A. M., & Kulchytska, O. O. (2022). Leksyko-stylistychni zasoby formuvannia obrazu holovnoho personazha u romani Dzhonatana Safrana Foiera «Extremely loud and incredibly close» [Lexical-stylistic devices of the main character's image formation in Jonathan Safran Foer's novel]. Zakarpatski filolohichni studii, 1(25), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2022.25.1.18

Hnatienko, K. V. (2016). Problemy vyvchennia khudozhnoho obrazu v literaturnomu tvori [Problems of studying the artistic image in a literary work]. Naukovyi visnyk Mykolaivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. O. Sukhomlynskoho. Filolohichni nauky (literaturoznavstvo), 1(17), 59–64.

Kukharenko, V. A. (2004). Interpretatsiia tekstu [Text interpretation]. Nova Knyha.

Maksymenko, Yu. B., & Synenkyi, D. O. (2009). Teoretychni zasady piznannia khudozhnoho obrazu [Theoretical foundations of artistic image cognition]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo, (4), 181–185.

Manakin, V. M. (2013). Vnutrishnia forma slova i natsionalne svitobachennia [Internal word form and national worldview]. Typolohiia movnykh znachen u diakhronichnomu ta zistavnomu aspektakh, (28), 39–48.

Schmidt, V. L. (2012). 45 master characters: Mythic models for creating original characters (2nd ed.). Writer's Digest Books.

Yefimov, L. P., & Yasinetska, O. A. (2004). Stylistyka anhliiskoi movy i dyskursyvnyi analiz [English stylistics and discourse analysis]. Nova Knyha.

Downloads


Abstract views: 0

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

LEXICO-SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC-STYLISTIC DEVICES IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF BETH ANN STANTON’S IMAGE IN THE SCREENPLAY "WHY WOMEN KILL": A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE. (2026). Germanic Philology. Journal of Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, 858-859, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.31861/gph2026.858-859.156-167

Similar Articles

1-10 of 201

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.