Digitalization of the International Legal Sphere: Systemic Challenges And Prospects for the Evolution of International Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/jiel.2026.2.18-31Keywords:
digital transformation of international law, human rights, international legal order, international legal responsibility, digital rights, artificial intelligence, international cooperation in the field of cybersecurityAbstract
This article examines the digital transformation of international law as a multidimensional process of rethinking traditional mechanisms of international interaction. It is argued that the penetration of digital technologies into the sphere of international legal regulation leads not only to the emergence of new objects of legal protection but also to the transformation of established approaches to determining state jurisdiction, enforcing international responsibility, and ensuring compliance with international obligations.
The paper identifies the key challenges of the digital age for international law, including the fragmentation of international regulation of the digital environment, the asymmetry of states’ technological capabilities, the complexity of establishing liability for cross-border digital offenses, and the need to harmonize cybersecurity requirements with international human rights standards. The study emphasizes that the effectiveness of international legal regulation increasingly depends on the ability of international institutions and states to ensure the interaction of universal legal principles with flexible mechanisms for responding to technological risks without undermining guarantees of human rights, state sovereignty, and international security.
Promising directions for legal development are outlined, including the improvement of international standards for digital governance, the formation of coordinated approaches to international legal liability for the use of digital technologies, the strengthening of international cooperation in the field of cybersecurity, and the development of regulatory mechanisms to oversee the use of artificial intelligence. The paper demonstrates the advisability of transitioning from a piecemeal response to individual technological threats to a systematic model of international legal regulation based on the principles of coherence and respect for fundamental human rights. It is concluded that the digital transformation of international law represents not only a technology-driven challenge but also an opportunity to renew its normative potential, institutional capacity, and instruments for ensuring the international legal order in the context of global digital interdependence.
References
1. Burchardt D. Does Digitalization Change International Law Structurally? German Law Journal. 2023; 24(3):438-460. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.31(date of access: 13.10.2026).
2. Krieger Heike & Liese Andrea eds. Tracing Value Change in the International Legal Order – Perspectives from Legal and Political Science. 2023. Krieger, Heike, and Andrea Liese (eds), Tracing Value Change in the International Legal Order: Perspectives from Legal and Political Science (Oxford, 2023; online edn, Oxford Academic, 22 June 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192855831.001.0001(date of access: 13.10.2026).
3. Casarosa Federica. Cybersecurity Certification of Artificial Intelligence: A Missed Opportunity to Coordinate Between the Artificial Intelligence Act and the Cybersecurity Act. International Cybersecurity Law Review. June 2022. 3(1). Рр. 1-16. DOI: 10.1365/s43439-021-00043-6 (date of access: 13.10.2026).
4. Burchardt Dana. The Concept of Legal Space: A Topological Approach for Addressing Multiple Legalities. Global Constitutionalism. Volume 11, Issue 3: Populist Challenges to Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives. November 2022. Рp. 518 – 547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381722000041(date of access: 13.10.2026).
5. Karvatska, S. B., & Hrushko, M. V. (2026). Mizhnarodno-pravovi zasady ta vyklyky vykorystannia tsyfrovykh dokaziv u protsesi prytiahnennia do vidpovidalnosti za voienni zlochyny [International legal principles and challenges of using digital evidence in proceedings concerning accountability for war crimes]. Pravnychyi chasopys Donetskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Vasylia Stusa, (1, Pt. 1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.31558/2786-5835.2026.1.1.9 (дата звернення: 14.10.2026).
6. Keyfacts UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethicsof ArtificialIntelligence URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385082(date of access: 13.10.2026).
7. Zakharchuk, I. (2025). Mizhnarodne pravo v umovakh tsyfrovizatsii: stanovlennia chetvertoho pokolinnia prav liudyny [International law in the context of digitalization: The emergence of the fourth generation of human rights]. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo, (3[5]), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.05.3.52(дата звернення: 14.10.2026).
8. UN GGE Report: Major Players Recommending Norms of Behaviour, Highlighting Aspects of International Law. 2015. URL: https://ccdcoe.org/incyder-articles/2015-un-gge-report-major-players-recommending-norms-of-behaviour-highlighting-aspects-of-international-law/ (date of access: 13.10.2026).
9. Osula Anna-Maria, Kasper Agnes & Kajander Aleksi. EU Common Position on International Law and Cyberspace, 2022. Vol. 16. No. 1 URL: https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJL2022-1-4(date of access: 13.10.2026).
10. Hughes S. U. S. Regulation of Blockchain Curr chain Currencies: A P encies: A Policy Overview. American University Washington College of Law. 2020. 1. 1. URL: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1883(date of access: 13.10.2026).
11. Karvatska, S. B., Manyk, A. Z., & Stroich, M. I. (2025). Kiberbezpeka: suchasni vyklyky ta mizhnarodno-pravovi ramky shchodo zakhystu danykh [Cybersecurity: Contemporary challenges and international legal frameworks for data protection]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia Pravo, (87, Pt. 4), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.87.4.39 (дата звернення: 14.10.2026).
12. Labik, A. R. (2025). Mizhnarodne pravo prav liudyny v umovakh tsyfrovizatsii: analiz kliuchovykh poniat [International human rights law in the context of digitalization: An analysis of key concepts]. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo, (6, Pt. 3), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.06.3.65(дата звернення: 14.10.2026).
13. Khaustova, M. H. (2022). Poniattia tsyfrovizatsii: natsionalni ta mizhnarodni pidkhody [The concept of digitalization: National and international approaches]. Pravo ta innovatsii, (2[38]), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2022-2(38)-1(дата звернення: 14.10.2026).
14. Golia Angelo Jr., Kettemann Matthias C., Kunz Raffaela [Eds.]. Digital Transformations in Public International Law. URL: https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_3560540_1/component/file_3560541/content (date of access: 13.10.2026).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of International and European Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.