Thematic Panels of Critical Discourse of Deliberative Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mediaforum.2024.15.237-250Keywords:
democracy, deliberative democracy, theory, criticism of the theory of deliberative democracy, deliberation, political institutions, political systemAbstract
The article describes the features of the main stages of the formation of research interest in the theoretical understanding of deliberative democracy and explores the main directions of criticism of the theory of deliberative democracy in the perspective of its conceptual renewal. The analysis of the features and directions of criticism of the theory of deliberative democracy in modern political science has proven that it is characterized by a wide space of the discursive field, marked by elements of uncertainty. The traditional thematic panels of the critical discourse of deliberative democracy can be defined as: first, its positioning as an overly idealistic model; second, the procedures and process of developing political consensus in the process of deliberation; third, the (de)motivation of political participation of citizens in the process of deploying institutionalized practices of deliberation; fourth, determining the role and significance of the political competence of citizens for achieving the goal of the deliberation process and ensuring the effectiveness of the functioning of democratic political systems.
Downloads
References
Achen, C. H., Bartels L. M. 2017. Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton: Princeton University.
Bächtiger, A., Dryzek J. S., Mansbridge J., Warren M. (eds.). 2018. The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bächtiger, A., Parkinson J. 2019. Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bächtiger, А., Niemeyer S., Neblo M., Steenbergen M. R., Steiner J. 2010. “Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities.” The Journal of Political Philosophy. 18(1): 32–63.
Chambers, S. 2009. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?” Political Theory. 37(3):323–350.
Dewey. J. 1954. The Public and Its Problems. Chicago. IL: Swallow Press.
Dryzek, J. S. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elster, J. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elstub, S. 2010. “The third generation of deliberative democracy”. Political Studies Review. 8(3):291-307.
Eriksen, E. O. 2009. The unfinished democratization of Europe. Oxford University Press.
Finlayson, J. G., Freyenhagen, F. (eds.). 2011. Habermas and RawlsDisputing the Political. London: Routledge.
Fung, A. 2005. “Deliberation Before the Revolution: Toward an Ethic of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World”. Political Theory. 33 (2): 397–419.
Gutmann, A., Thompson, D. F. 1998. Democracy and disagreement. Harvard University Press.
Hibbing, J. R., Theiss-Morse, E. 2002. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S. 2012. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy”. In: Parkinson, J., Mansbridge, J (eds.). Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1–26.
Mouffe, C. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?”. Social research. 66(3):745–758.
Mueller, J. 2001. Capitalism, Democracy and Ralph’s Pretty Good Grocery. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Owen, D., Smith, G. 2015. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn”. The Journal of Political Philosophy. 23(2):213–234.
Parkinson, J. 2006. Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parkinson, J. 2016. “Models, Metaphors, and Their Consequences: The Curious Case of Deliberative Systems”. Paper Presented at ECPR Joint Sessions. 24–28 April.
Pincione, G., Tesón, F. R. 2006. Rational choice and democratic deliberation: A theory of discourse failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenberg, S. W. 2014. “Citizen competence and the psychology of deliberation.” In: Deliberative democracy: Issues and cases. Estlub, S., McLaverty P. (eds.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Rostbøll, C. 2008. Deliberative freedom: Deliberative democracy as critical theory. Albany: SUNY Press.
Sanders, L. 1997. “Against Deliberation”. Political Theory. 25(3):347–376.
Shapiro, I. 1999. “Enough of deliberation: Politics is about interests and power.” In: Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. S. Macedo (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, I. 2017. “Collusion in restraint of democracy: Against political deliberation”. Daedalus. 146(3):77–84.
Taber, C. S., Lodge M. 2006. “Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science. 50(3):755–769.
Thompson, D. F. 2008. “Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science.” Annual Review of Political Science. 11:497–520.
Walzer, M. 1999. “Deliberation, and What Else.” In: Macedo S. (eds.). Deliberative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 58–70.
Warren, M. E. 2017. “A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory”. American Political Science Review. 111(1):39–53.
Rotar, N. 2021. “Protsedurni aspekty vykorystannia dialohovoi modeli politychnoi uchasti v YeS: riven Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu”. Istoryko-politychni problemy suchasnoho svitu. 44:78–90.
Rotar, N. 2021a. “Funktsionalni osoblyvosti yevropeiskoi hromadianskoi initsiatyvy yak innovatsiinoho formatu politychnoi uchasti v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi“. Mizhnarodni vidnosyny, suspilni komunikatsii ta rehionalni studii. № 3(11):235–256.
Rotar, N. 2022. “Instytutsiine onovlennia deliberatyvnoi modeli politychnoi uchasti hromadian YeS”. Mizhnarodni vidnosyny, suspilni komunikatsii ta rehionalni studii. 3(14):234–251.
Rotar, N. 2022a. “Transformatsiia markeriv teorii deliberatyvnoi demokratii v suchasnii politychnii nautsi“. Mediaforum: analityka, prohnozy, informatsiinyi menedzhment: zb. nauk. prats. Chernivtsi: Chernivetskyi nats. un-t im. Yu. Fedkovycha. 10:25–42.
Rotar, N. 2023. “Dynamika rozghortannia deliberatyvykh praktyk modeliuvannia protsesu vidnovlennia Ukrainy”. Wschód Europy. 9 (1):11–35.
Rotar, N. 2023a. “Rozghortannia deliberatyvnoi modeli politychnoi uchasti hromadian YeS v dyskursi maibutnoho yevropeiskoi demokratii“. Mediaforum: analityka, prohnozy, informatsiinyi menedzhment. 13:51–78.
