Comparative Analysis of Optimal Power Flow Algorithms in Networks with Distributed Generation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/sisiot2026.1.01009

Keywords:

optimal power flow, distributed energy resources, distributed optimisation, distribution networks, closed-loop control

Abstract

This paper presents the formulation of the optimisation problem and a comparative analysis of real-time optimal power flow (RT-OPF) algorithms for distribution networks with a high penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs), including solar and wind generation as well as battery energy storage systems. The intermittent nature of many DERs and the emergence of bidirectional power flows increase the risk of violations of operational constraints, primarily voltage deviations and overloading of network elements. This creates a need for fast DER coordination mechanisms capable of operating on a sub-second timescale under limited communication bandwidth. The RT-OPF problem is formulated as a constrained optimisation problem in which the active and reactive power setpoints of DERs are selected to minimise aggregate undesirable effects and operating costs, subject to compliance with the local technical constraints of the devices and the network operating limits. Three algorithmic approaches widely described in the literature are considered: the primal-dual gradient method (PDGM), the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), and proximal atomic coordination (PAC). The comparison is carried out according to five practically important criteria: the number of iterations per control interval, the complexity of local computations, communication requirements and scalability, robustness to delays and partial asynchronicity, and the ability to ensure compliance with local and network constraints in closed-loop control. It is shown that PDGM is generally the most suitable baseline choice for sub-second RT-OPF in large-scale aggregator-based systems owing to the simplicity of its local updates and its compact data exchange, whereas PAC provides smoother behaviour near active constraints at the cost of a more computationally demanding local step. ADMM can achieve high consensus accuracy given sufficient iterations; however, in practice it is more appropriate for slower control loops and in the presence of a reliable synchronous communication infrastructure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Pavlo Leshchenko, General Energy Institute of NAS of Ukraine

    PhD student at General Energy Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. The research interests include the modelling, analysis, and simulation of optimisation algorithms for aggregators in distribution grids with a high penetration of distributed energy resources, focusing on coordinated control for the provision of grid support services.

  • Artur Zaporozhets, General Energy Institute of NAS of Ukraine

    Doctor of Technical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Deputy Director at the General Energy Institute of NAS of Ukraine. His work focuses on energy system modeling, forecasting, and sustainability. Author of 300+ publications (Scopus h-index 23). Laureate of national awards; listed among the World’s Top 2% Scientists.

References

G. Kostenko and O. Zgurovets, “Current State and Prospects for Development of Renewable Distributed Generation in Ukraine,” Syst. Res. Energy, no. 2, pp. 4–17, 2023, doi: 10.15407/srenergy2023.02.004.

V. Babak and M. Kulyk, “Increasing the Efficiency and Security of Integrated Power System Operation Through Heat Supply Electrification in Ukraine,” Sci. Innov., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 100–116, 2023, doi: 10.15407/scine19.05.100.

O. Kyrylenko, S. Denysiuk, and I. Blinov, “Digital Transformation of the Energy Industry: Current Trends and Tasks,” Pr. Inst. Elektrodyn. NAS Ukr., vol. 65, pp. 5–14, 2023, doi: 10.15407/publishing2023.65.005.

I. Diahovchenko, G. Morva, A. Chuprun, and A. Keane, “Comparison of Voltage Rise Mitigation Strategies for Distribution Networks with high Photovoltaic Penetration,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 212, Art. no. 115399, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115399.

A. Bernstein, E. Dall`Anese, and A. Simonetto, “Online Primal-Dual Methods with Measurement Feedback for Time-Varying Convex Optimization,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1978–1991, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TSP.2019.2896112.

G. Kostenko and A. Zaporozhets, “Enhancing of the Power System Resilience through the Application of Micro Power Systems (Microgrid) with Renewable Distributed Generation,” Syst. Res. Energy, no. 3, pp. 25–38, 2023, doi: 10.15407/srenergy2023.03.025.

I. Khomenko, A. Shkrebela, and V. Orlov, “Optimization of Distribution Network Mode by Voltage Under Modern Conditions,” Bull. Nat. Tech. Univ. “KhPI”. Ser. Energy: Reliab. Energy Effic., no. 2(9), 2024, doi: 10.20998/EREE.2024.2(9).317375.

O. Hotra et al., “Organisation of the Structure and Functioning of Self-Sufficient Distributed Power Generation,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 1, Art. no. 27, 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17010027.

IEEE Standard for Interconnection and Interoperability of Distributed Energy Resources with Associated Electric Power Systems Interfaces, IEEE Std 1547-2018, Apr. 2018.

Voltage characteristics of electricity supplied by public electricity networks (DSTU EN 50160:2023, EN 50160:2022, IDT). Kyiv, Ukraine, 2023.

A. Bernstein and E. Dall’Anese, “Real-Time Feedback-Based Optimization of Distribution Grids: A Unified Approach,” IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1197–1209, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TCNS.2019.2929648.

E. Dall’Anese, H. Zhu, and G. B. Giannakis, “Distributed Optimal Power Flow for Smart Microgrids,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1464–1475, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2013.2248175.

J. Huang, B. Cui, X. Zhou, and A. Bernstein, “A Generalized LinDistFlow Model for Power Flow Analysis,” in Proc. 2021 60th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control (CDC), 2021, doi: 10.1109/CDC45484.2021.9682997.

S. Bolognani and S. Zampieri, “On the Existence and Linear Approximation of the Power Flow Solution in Power Distribution Networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 163–172, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2395452.

S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511804441.

E. Dall’Anese, A. Simonetto, and S. Dhople, “Design of distributed controllers seeking optimal power flow solutions under communication constraints,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control (CDC), 2016, doi: 10.1109/CDC.2016.7799426.

S. Boyd, N. Parikh, E. Chu, B. Peleato, and J. Eckstein, “Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers,” Found. Trends Mach. Learn., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–122, 2011, doi: 10.1561/2200000016.

S. Magnússon, G. Qu, and N. Li, “Distributed Optimal Voltage Control with Asynchronous and Delayed Communication,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3469–3482, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2020.2970768.

V. C. Gungor et al., “Smart Grid Technologies: Communication Technologies and Standards,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 529–539, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TII.2011.2166794.

A. Bernstein and E. Dall'Anese, “Real-Time Feedback-Based Optimization of Distribution Grids: A Unified Approach,” IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1197–1209, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TCNS.2019.2929648.

Y. Zhang, M. Hong, E. Dall'Anese, S. V. Dhople, and Z. Xu, “Distributed Controllers Seeking AC Optimal Power Flow Solutions Using ADMM,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 4525–4537, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2662639.

J. Eckstein and D. P. Bertsekas, “On the Douglas–Rachford Splitting Method and the Proximal Point Algorithm for Maximal Monotone Operators,” Math. Program., vol. 55, pp. 293–318, 1992, doi: 10.1007/BF01581204.

T. Erseghe, “Distributed Optimal Power Flow Using ADMM,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2370–2380, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2306495.

J. J. Romvary, G. Ferro, R. Haider, and A. M. Annaswamy, “A Proximal Atomic Coordination Algorithm for Distributed Optimization,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 646–661, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TAC.2021.3053907.

N. Parikh and S. Boyd, “Proximal Algorithms,” Found. Trends Optim., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 127–239, 2014, doi: 10.1561/2400000003.

P. L. Combettes and J.-C. Pesquet, “Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing,” in Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, H. H. Bauschke et al., Eds. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2011, pp. 185–212, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9569-8.

M. Kraning, E. Chu, J. Lavaei, and S. Boyd, “Dynamic Network Energy Management via Proximal Message Passing,” Found. Trends Optim., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–122, 2014, doi: 10.1561/2400000002.

Downloads


Abstract views: 0

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
P. Leshchenko and A. Zaporozhets, “Comparative Analysis of Optimal Power Flow Algorithms in Networks with Distributed Generation”, SISIOT, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 01009, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.31861/sisiot2026.1.01009.

Similar Articles

51-60 of 75

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.