International relations in the context of modern hybrid war
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mediaforum.2018.6.136-146Keywords:
confrontation, “cold war”, “hybrid war”, NATO, European UnionAbstract
The present paper considers the main approaches to definition and understanding of concept of hybrid war, the substantive provisions of the phenomenon of hybrid war and its features in the international relations are analyzed, absence of unified definition of concept of “hybrid war” in scientific field is stated, also pre-conditions of hybrid war development by a countryaggressor are considered.
Actuality of problem. The problem of the “Hybrid War” due to the increase of the tension level is actualized, which ultimately leads to significant resource losses. All this affects on development of society and the state, as weal as on the all the processes that take place in them.
Lately in different parts of the world there is a far of local and domestic conflicts that on the essence appear opposition of supercountries through aspiration to protect the interests and occupy leader positions on a world political arena. This problem puts further європейську and world safety under a threat.
“Cold war” became one of main varieties of relations between countries during the last two centuries through intensifying of political rivalry and wars for diverse reasons. This position predetermines the necessity of deep and objective research of this phenomenon. Consequently it is very important to expose maintenance, pre-conditions of origin, basic signs and possible consequences of this destructive process from event on east of Ukraine. Also study of this problem predefined by the necessity of fight and evelopment of effective counterweapons, determination of ways of her avoidance to hybrid war in the future. Innovativeness of analysis of this problem appears through a look to hybrid war in Ukraine as a constituent of “cold war”, new landmark of history of opposition to Russia and the West, exposure of the personal touches of “cold war” in our time, establishment of conceptual positions of this concept and him specific lines in international relations.
Downloads
References
Arzumanyan R.V., “Opredelenie voyny v 21 veke”. Obzor XXI ezhegodnoy konferentsii po strategii Instituta strategicheskikh issledovaniy Armeyskogo voennogo kolledzha, 6-8 aprelya 2010. (Yerevan, 2011), 60. (accessed may 15, 2018).
Bedritskiy A.V., “Evolyutsiya amerikanskoy kontseptsii informatsionnoy voyny,” Analiticheskie obzory RISI 3 (2003): 26.
Dynys H. “Suchasni hibrydni zbroini konflikty (pryklad ahresii Rosiiskoi Federatsii proty Ukrainy),” Heopolityka Ukrainy: istoriia ta suchasnist 2 (2016) : 108-112.
Lasvel G. Tekhnika propagandy v mirovoy voyne (Moskva, Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo, 1929), 200.
Maklyuen G.M. Ponimanie media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka (Moskva: Giperboreya, Kuchkovo pole, 2007), 464.
Pocheptsov G. G. Psikhologicheskie voyny (Moskva: Refl-buk; K.: Vakler, 2000), 528.
“U SBU zaiavyly, shcho rosiiski kanaly zastosovuiut proty telehliadachiv 25-y kadr”, TSN, ostannia zmina 15 travnia, 2017, http://tsn.ua/politika/u-sbuzayavili-scho-rosiyski-kanali-zastosovuyutprotiteleglyadachiv-25-y-kadr-350517.htm (accessed may 15, 2018).
Hoffman F.G. “Hybrid vs. compound war,” Armed Forces Journal, October, 2009, http://armedforcesjournal.com/hybrid-vs-compound-war/ (accessed may 15, 2018).
Hoffman F. G. “Future Threats and Strategic Thinking,” In Unity Journal, Fall, 2011, https://www.inИnityjournal.com/article/34/Future_Threats_and_Strategic_Thinking/ (accessed may 15, 2018).