Political transformations in the Czech Republic after the “Velvet revolution”: a retrospective approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mediaforum.2020.8.148-164Keywords:
Czechoslovakia, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, political transformations, «velvet revolution», European UnionAbstract
Using a retrospective approach, the author explores the changes that took place in Czechoslovakia after the 1989 «velvet revolution». The article emphasizes that the «velvet revolution» later grew into a national revolution and led to the emergence of two new nation-states; into a political revolution that destroyed the authoritarian regime and contributed to the emergence of new democratic political institutions; in the economic revolution, during which the mechanisms of a market economy were created in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The country made a simultaneous transition from dictatorship to democracy, from a command economy to a free market and to a nation state. Despite such a difficult situation and a large number of tasks, Czechoslovakia was able to eliminate the totalitarian legacy, solved the transformational tasks and problems of the division of Czechoslovakia into two sovereign states.
In the Czech Republic, the classical political mechanisms of a democratic civil society had already been established in the 1990s and first, a multiparty political system. New democratic election laws laid the groundwork for a competitive multi-party system and political pluralism. The 1993 Constitution of the Czech Republic legislated a new political system for a democratic society, which was to be based on the voluntary creation and competition of political parties, who respect fundamental democratic principles and deny violence as a means to an end. The «velvet revolution» caused a sharp rise in civic activity. On the eve of the first parliamentary elections in 1992, more than 140 political parties and right-wing and left-wing social movements were registered in the CSFM. This was the peak of the quantitative growth of the number of political parties at the stage of building civil society.
Downloads
References
Adresář politických stran, hnutí a sdružení občanů v ČSFR. Praha: Institut pro studium demokracie, 1992, 416 s.
Bunce V. Comparing East and South. Journal of Democracy, 1995, № 3, Р. 90-112.
Bútorov M., Butorová Z. Neznesitelná láhkost rozchodu / Vodička K., Kipké R. Rozlučení s Československém. Praha: Český spisovatel, 1993,S.119-150.
Byznys. Hospodářské noviny, 2012, 2 července.
Česka republika – na cestĕ ke vstupu do EU. Studie Svĕtové banky. Praha, 1999, S. 142-146.
Gati Ch. If Not Democracy, What? Leaders, Laggards, and Losers in the Postcommunist World. Mandelbaum M. (ed.) Postcommunism. Four Perspectives. New York, 1996, Р. 168-198.
Havlík K., Kopeček L. Krize vládnutí v České republice. Analýza působeni volebniho a stranického systému a návrhy možnych řešení. Politolohicky časopis, 2008, № 3, S. 190-211.
Henderson K. and Robinson N. Post-Communist Politics. An introduction. Prentice Hall Europe. L., 1997, 427 р.
Klaus V. Čtyři roky transformace naší ekonomiky. Politická ekonomie, 1993 (b), № 6, S. 707–715.
Klaus V. Dopočitávání do jedné. Praha, 1995, 183 s.
Klaus V. Europa, naše vizi a naše strategie. Ekonom, 1995, №8, S.19-25.
Klaus V. Makroekonomická stranka systémovych zmĕn: poučení z české zkušenosti. Politická ekonomie, 1993 (а), № 3, S. 291–299.
Klaus V. Nefunkční Europa si zaslouží obdobný přistup jako kdysi komunismus. Ekonom, 2012, № 3, S. 33-41.
Klaus V. Pozvání do NATO – historicky pršedel. Lidové noviny, 1997, 12 červenca.
Klaus V. Transit Economies - 20 Rocks because. Ekonom, 2012, № 3, S. 63-78.
Konvergenční program České republiky 2010. Praha, 2010, Leden. URL: http://www.vlada.cz (дата звернення: 21.11.2020).
Krejči J. Nová kniha o volbách. Praha: Professional Publishing, 2006. 481 s.
Mišovič J. K roli nepolitických organizací a hnutí po 1980 u nás. Pohledy, 2000, № 6, S. 1–5.
Nelson J. M. How Market Reforms and Democratic Consolidation Affect Each Other / Nelson J.M. et al. (Eds.) Intricate Links: Democratization and Market Reforms in Latin America and Eastern Europe. New Brunswick, 1994. Р. 1-36.
Offe C. Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe. Social Research, 1991, № 4, Winter. Р. 865-892.
Politické strany a hnutí v ČSFR. Praha: Pragopress - ČTK, Institut pro studium demokracie, 1992, 191 s.
Programové prohlášení vlády ČR od 14.02.2014. URL: http://www.vlada.cz. (дата звернення: 21.11.2020).
Roeder Ph.G. The Revolution of 1989: Postcommunism and the Social Sciences. Slavic Review, 1999, № 4, Winte, Р. 742-764.
Šimonik P. Politické spectrum v České republice. Sociologický časopis, 1996, № 4, S. 453-467.
Škodová Y., Mužiková M. Nový plan: pro pacienty pořidit vice zdraví za stejné penize. Hospodářské noviny, 2011, 21–23 října.
The 2009 Ageing Report; economic and budgetary Projections for the EU-27 Member States (2008–2060). URL: https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance /publications/pages/ublication14992_en.pdf (дата звернення: 21.11.2020).
Transformation Index. URL: http:// www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/cps/ rde/xchg/SID-FC84973C-5A9C80CF/bst_engl/hs.xsl/prj_6042_6049.htm (дата звернення: 21.11.2020).
Umístění Čechů a Slováků do podřízeného jediného státu. Ekonom. 2003. №. 1. S. 8-12.
Ústava České republiky // Sbírka zákonů. 1993. Č. 1- 3.
Ústavni zakon o rozpusteni Ceske a Slovenske federativni republiky. Praha, 1992. URL: http://www.psp.cz/cgi-bin/ascii/eknih/1990fs/tisky/t1078_01. htm (дата звернення: 21.11.2020).
Večerník J. Občan a tržní ekonomika. Příjmy, nerovnost a politické postoje v české společnosti. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny. 1998. 325 s.
Vodička K. Přičiny rozdĕlĕní Československa: analýza po 10 letech // Politický časopis. 2003. № 1. S. 57–61.