Azerbaijan – Armenia – Georgia: Challenges and Prospects of Interstate Cooperation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mediaforum.2023.13.97-110Keywords:
South Caucasus, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Nagorno-Karabakh, Russian-Ukrainian warAbstract
In the conditions of the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war, the question of the future world order is more than urgent. The introduction of the sanctions regime against Russia led to the intensification of the latter’s efforts in the direction of creating its own ecosystem of survival, in which the states of the South Caucasus, in particular, the former Soviet republics such as Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, are considered indispensable components. In their research, the authors analyze the features of the socio-political development of the named states of the South Caucasus in its relationship with the events of the Russian-Ukrainian war and changes.
The authors draw attention to the importance of the South Caucasus for ensuring the ability of the Russian Federation to continue the war against Ukraine at the current stage. In its desire to regain its status as a world leader, the Russian Federation is trying with all its might to preserve the existing status quo in the region, on the one hand, while simultaneously improving its relations with Turkey and Azerbaijan, on the other. The latter was quite clearly revealed during the Second Karabakh War in 2020 and the events of September 19, 2023 in Nagorno-Karabakh. The return of Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan due to the termination of the existence of the NKR from January 1, 2024 opens up new prospects not only for regional development, but also for the resolution of other “frozen” conflicts created by Moscow.
Eliminating the factor of military confrontation from the regional order is an important element of geopolitical stability and security in the region. And Georgia in this case plays an important role, on the one hand, as a potential mediator, and on the other, as a state that has a strategic partnership with Azerbaijan and good-neighborly relations with Armenia.
Downloads
References
Horbulin, V. P., & Badrak, V. V. (2023). Voiennyi 2024-y: zahadky dlia Ukrainy. Visnyk NAN Ukrainy, (11), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2023.11.008
Vidnianskyi, Stepan, Martynov, Andrii. 2023. “Rosiisko-ukrainska viina ta mizhnarodne spivtovarystvo”. Kyiv. Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy.
Gorbulin, Volodymyr. red. 2017. Svitova hibrydna viina: ukrainskyi front. Kyiv : NISD.
De Oliveira, Astrid Prange. 2023. “Nahirnyi Karabakh: neskinchennyi konflikt”. https://www.dw.com/uk/nagirnij-karabah-neskincennij-konflikt/a-66947953
“Druha Karabaska viina pokazala, shcho nemaie zamorozhenykh konfliktiv – posol Ukrainy v Azerbaidzhani”. 2021. https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/3255600-druga-karabaska-vijna-pokazala-so-nemae-zamorozenih-konfliktiv-posol-ukraini-v-azerbajdzani.html
“Zahostrennia u Nahirnomu Karabakhu. Shcho vidbuvaietsia i chomu tse vazhlyvo”. 2022. https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-62414717
Zamikula, M.2021. “Shchodo kavkazkoho napriamku zovnishnoi polityky Islamskoi Respubliky Iran ta zahostrennia azerbaidzhano-iranskykh vidnosyn”. https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2021-10/azerbajan-iran_27102021_0.pdf;
“Etnichnyi chynnyk «zamorozhenykh konfliktiv»: vysnovky dlia Donbasu”. 2019. https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2019-01/111Az_Stepiko_ 31.10.20 18- d36d6.pdf
Kyrydon A.M., Troian S.S. 2009. Rosiisko-hruzynskyi konflikt serpnia 2008 roku: istoryko-politolohichnyi analiz / A.M.Kyrydon, S.S.Troian. Kyiv-Rivne: RIS KSU. 80 с.
Kovalenko, Artem. 2008. “Uhody z Rosiieiu ne varti y paperu, na yakomu napysani”. https://gazeta.ua/articles/history-newspaper/_ugodi-z-rosiyeyu-ne-varti-j-paperu-na-yakomu-napisani/242730
Kudriachenko, Andrii. 2022. “Prahmatyzm i zbalansovanist – osnovni skladnyky postradianskoho rozvytku Azerbaidzhanu”. http://ud.gdip.com.ua /wp-content/uploads/2022/12/45-2022.pdf
Mahda, Yevhen. 2017. Hibrydna ahresiia Rosii: uroky dlia Yevropy. Kyiv: KALAMAR.
Mahda, Yevhen. 2015. Hibrydna viina: vyzhyty i peremohty. Kharkiv: Vivat.
Machuskyi, Valerii. 2018. “Vytoky ta evoliutsiia mizhetnichnykh konfliktiv u nezalezhnii Hruzii”. https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads /2018/07/ machu skyi_vytoky-1.pdf;
Telenko, Olena. 2019. “Respublika Pivdenna Osetiia yak marionetkova derzhava Rosiiskoi Federatsii”. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia mizhnarodni vidnosyny. Vypusk 46. С. 99-111.
Musavy, Nyka. 2023. “ Kak Hruzyy udaёtsia bыt neitralnoi v konflykte v Karabakhe ”. https://www.dw.com/ru/kak-gruzii-udaetsa-ostatsa-nejtralnoj-v-karabahskom-konflikte/a-64467159
“Nahirnyi Karabakh. Materialy po temi”. 2023. LB.ua. Doroslyi pohliad na svit.https://lb.ua/tag/389_nagirniy_karabah;
Panchenko, Yurii. 2023. “Tretia karabaska. Chomu pochalasia nova viina na Kavkazi ta yakymy budut yii naslidky”. https://www.eurointegration .com.ua/articles/2023/09/20/7169767/
Pashaieva, Kseniia. 2021. “Chynnyky politychnoi transformatsii krain Pivdennoho Kavkazu”. Dysertatsiia. https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Pashaieva _Kseniia Chynnyky_politychnoi_transformatsii_krain_ Pivdennoho _Kavka zu.pdf?
Plokhii, Serhii. 2023. Rosiisko-ukrainska viina. Povernennia istorii. Kharkiv: KSD.
Savchuk, Tetiana. 2020. “Nahirnyi Karabakh: konflikt u 10 vidpovidiakh”. https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/30864543.html
“Sud OON zoboviazav Azerbaidzhan harantuvaty bezpechne povernennia virmen u Karabakh”. 2023. https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news /2023 /11/17/7173791/
Sukhiashvili, D.2012. “Metodolohiia ta stan vyvchennia zovnishnoi polityky Hruzii v konteksti yevropeiskoi intehratsii”. http://socio-journal.kpi.kiev. ua/archive/2012/3/7.pdf
“Yak Rosiia vykorystovuie viinu v Nahirnomu Karabakhu”. 2023. https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2023/09/20/7169795/
“26 bereznia mynulo 25 rokiv vid pidpysannia Kemp-Devidskoho myrnoho dohovoru mizh Yehyptom i Izrailem”. 2004. https://www.radiosvoboda.org /a/914153.html