Visegral Grоup: Geopolitical Reality and Prospects for Functioning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/pvmfh060Keywords:
Visegrad Group, European Union, Ukraine, Polish, Hungarian, Czech, Slovak, regionalism, European integration, international securityAbstract
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state and prospects of the Visegrad Group as one of the key geo-economic clusters of Central European countries in Europe. It examines the geo-economic and political reasons behind the creation of the Visegrad Group and provides a comparative assessment of the economic potential of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia within the broader European economic context. The study concludes that the Russian–Ukrainian war has become a major geopolitical trigger for the Visegrad countries, and the level of support for Ukraine can serve as an indicator of the geopolitical orientation of each government.
The findings suggest that, in the long term, ideological differences are unlikely to break the cohesion of the countries that established the Visegrad Group, regardless of the political preferences of ruling governments. However, there is a risk that persistent political divergences may push individual V4 members to seek alternative formats of regional cooperation. Another option for the future existence of the V4 is the reform of political interaction and a change in the foreign policy priorities of Hungary and Slovakia, with the hope of effective political opposition in these countries. The growing contradictions in the foreign policy courses of the member states pose a challenge to the Visegrad Group’s ability to operate as a unified geopolitical actor.
Downloads
References
Abegunde B. (2021) Regional Cooperation and State Sovereignty. Athens Journal of Law. Vol. 7, Is. 2, PP. 169-188. URL: https://www.athensjournals.gr/law/2021-7-2-3-Abegunde.pdf
Androshchuk I. (2023) Rol derzhav Vyshehradskoi hrupy v polityko-dyplomatychnii ta viiskovii pidtrymtsi Ukrainy pislia povnomasshtabnoho vtorhnennia Rosiiskoi federatsii. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia filos.-politoloh. studii.. Vypusk 51, s. 109–120 (in Ukrainian).
ВВС News Ukraina (2025) Vybory v Chekhii: peremohla partiia yevroskeptyka Babisha. Shcho tse znachyt dlia Ukrainy.04.10.2025. URL: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/articles/cm28g5267j4o (in Ukrainian).
Drohoziuk N. (2024) Vyshehradska hrupa: dynamika stanovlennia ta suchasni realii rozvytku Istoryko-politychni problemy suchasnoho svitu:Zbirnyk naukovykh statei. Chernivtsi::Chernivetskyi natsionalnyi universytet. T. 49. S. 75-83 (in Ukrainian).
Gerasymchuk S. (2022). The Prospects of Cooperation between Ukraine and Romania within 3 Seas Initiative. Ukrainian prism. URL: https://prismua.org/en/13744
International Visegrad Fund. (2000) URL: https://www.visegradfund.org/
Kalasopatan A. (2024) Central Europe: a fairly successful integration. BNP Paribas. Etudes Économiques – BNP Paribas. URL: https://economic research.bnpparibas.com/html/en-US/Central-Europe-fairly-successful-integration-7/15/2024,49793
Klingová K., Milo D. (2017) The Vulnerability Index: Subversive Russian Influence in Central Europe. Globsec Policy Institute URL: https://www.globsec.org/what-we-do/publications/vulnerability-index-subversive-russian-influence-central-europe
Lenz T., Marks G. (2016). Regional Institutional Designs: Delegation and Pooling. Oxford Handbook of Comparable Regionalism, pp.513-537. URL: https://garymarks.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13018/2017/02/Lenz-Marks_2016_regional-institutional-design.pdf
Moskalenko Yu. (2025) Lidery trokh krain maiut namir koordynuvaty pozytsii ta provodyty poperedni narady pered samitamy YeS. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. 28.10.2025. URL: https://zn.ua/ukr/WORLD/antiukrajinskij-aljans-u-orbana-zajavili-pro-namir-objednatisja-z-chekhijeju-ta-slovachchinoju.html (in Ukrainian).
Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen (2023) Vyshehradska hrupa v novykh politychnykh realiiakh URL: https://niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/mizhnarodni-vidnosyny/vyshehradska-hrupa-v-novykh-politychnykh-realiyakh (in Ukrainian).
Obserwator Finansowy. (2016) The Visegrad Group countries are closer politically than economically. URL: https://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/in-english/macroeconomics/the-visegrad-group-countries-are-closer-politically-than-economically/
Özoflu M. (2023) Slavkov Triangle as a Minilateral Grouping Within the European Union: A Quantitative Analysis. Köz-gazdaság. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370301031_Slavkov_Triangle_as_a_Minilateral_Grouping_within_the_European_Union_A_Quantitative_Analysis
Rudik N. M. (2020) Ekonomichne vriaduvannia v YeS: rozbudova v konteksti suchasnykh vyklykiv . Derzhavne upravlinnia ta mistseve samovriaduvannia : zb. nauk. pr. Dnipro. Vyp. 4 (47). S. 49-57 (in Ukrainian).
Schäffer S.,Talik M. (2025) IDM Short Insight 44: The Weimar Triangle – A Key Format for Europe? Institute for the Danube Region and Central Europe. URL: https://www.idm.at/en/idm-short-insight-weimar-triangle/
Statistische Bundesamt. (2024) 20 Jahre EU-Osterweiterung: Polen und Tschechien in den Top 10 der wichtigsten Handelspartner Deutschlands.. URL: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Ueber-uns/Organisation/_inhalt.html
Strazay T. (2025) The New Geopolitics and Its Impact on Regional Cooperation Formats in Central Europe. Studia Polityczne 53(1):12-33. URL: https://czasopisma.isppan.waw.pl/sp/article/view/3391
Ukrainska pryzma. (2018). Yak dali buduvaty spivpratsiu Ukrainy z Vyshehradskoiu hrupoiu? URL: https://prismua.org/ як-далі-будувати-співпрацю-україни (in Ukrainian).









