Specific Features of Public Authority Functioning in Ukraine Under Martial Law: the Problem of Legitimacy

Halyna Kuts; Iryna Peresypkina; Yurii Kuts

doi:10.31861/mediaforum.2025.17.194-204

Authors

Halyna Kuts H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7263-1958
Iryna Peresypkina Karazin Kharkiv National University Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-7127
Yurii Kuts Karazin Kharkiv National University Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8629-012X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mediaforum.2025.17.194-204

Keywords:

public authority, local self-government bodies, state authorities, public administration, martial law, legitimacy, civil society, national identity, democracy, Ukraine

Abstract

This article examines the specific characteristics of public authority functioning in Ukraine under martial law. Public authorities encompass both local self-government bodies and state authorities (executive power). The ongoing war has generated new patterns of interaction between these entities – local self-government and state authorities on the one hand, and civil society and public authorities on the other.

The nature of cooperation in shaping regional policy has changed substantially, particularly between local councils and military administrations. Currently, there is no uniform practice of interaction across Ukraine; mechanisms vary depending on territorial proximity to the front line (frontline, near-frontline, or rear areas).

Another critical challenge concerns the legitimacy of governing bodies.

Given the impossibility of holding elections during wartime, strategies for legitimising public institutions become essential.

Civil society also demands the development of a national-patriotic policy. Strengthening national identity – rather than regional identity – should become a priority for public authorities, serving as a significant factor in legitimising governance in the absence of elections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Halyna Kuts, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

D.Sc. in Political Science H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University
Iryna Peresypkina, Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD in Political Science V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
Yurii Kuts, Karazin Kharkiv National University

D.Sc. in Public Administration V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

References

Borshchevskyi V.V., Vasylytsia O.B., Matvyeyev E.E. (2022). Publichne upravlinnya v umovakh voyennoho stanu: instytutsiyni transformatsiyi, stratehichne planuvannya ta mekhanizmy rozvytku. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriya: Publichne upravlinnya i administruvannya. № 2 (76). S. 30–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/1813-3401.2022.2.5 (in Ukrainian).

Weber M. (1998). Try chysti typy lehitymnoho panuvannya. URL: http://litopys.org.ua/weber/wbs07.htm (in Ukrainian).

Grant W. (2005). Legititimacy. Korotkyy oksfordskyy politychnyy slovnyk. [trans. from English]. Vydavnytstvo Solomiyi Pavlychko «OSNOVY», Kyiv. S. 356–357 (in Ukrainian).

Duliba E. (2022). Osoblyvosti orhanizatsiyi diyalnosti mistsevykh orhaniv vykonavchoyi vlady ta orhaniv mistsevoho samovryaduvannya pid chas voyennoho stanu. Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva. Vyp. 4 (32). S. 46–45. DOI:10.35774/app2022.04.046 (in Ukrainian).

Zhukova E.O. (2022). Publichne administruvannya ta derzhavne upravlinnya: osoblyvosti spivvidnoshennya. Analitychno-porivnyalne pravoznavstvo. № 2. S. 137–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.02.26 (in Ukrainian).

Constitution of Ukraine (1996). Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80 (in Ukrainian).

Kuts H.M. (2007). Problematyka identychnosti v liberalnomu konteksti. Pytannya politolohiyi. № 785. S. 79–85 (in Ukrainian] ).

Nakonechna G.Y., Zinkevych V.K. (2023). Mistseve samovryaduvannya v umovakh voyennoho stanu. Istoryko-pravovyy chasopys. Tom 21. S. 43–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2409-4544/2023-2/6 (in Ukrainian).

President of Ukraine (2022). Pro vvedennya voyennoho stanu v Ukrayini. Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrayiny № 64/2022 vid 24.02.2022. URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/161/2010 (in Ukrainian).

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2025). Pro pravovyy rezhym voyennoho stanu. Verkhovna Rada Ukrayiny, Zakon Ukrayiny № 389-VIII red. vid 14.05.2025. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2704-19#Text (in Ukrainian).

Siryi Yu.M. (2024). Aktualni pytannya diyalnosti mistsevykh orhaniv vykonavchoyi vlady v umovakh voyennoho stanu. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriya: yurydychni nauky. Tom 35 (74). № 3. S. 123–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/TNU-2707-0581/2024.3/20 (in Ukrainian).

Terletskyi A.V. (2023). Spetsialna pravosubyektnist orhaniv publichnoho upravlinnya v umovakh voyennoho stanu. Naukovyy visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriya: Yurysprudentsiya. № 64. S. 60–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32841/2307-1745.2023.64.12 (in Ukrainian).

Yakovleva L.I. (2020). Kanon lehitymnosti: klasychni vyznachennya, polityko-pravovi kontrasty, suchasni vyklyky. Politykus. Vyp. 1. S. 5-11. DOI https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-9616- 2020.1.01 (in Ukrainian).

Guibernau M. (2012). Identychnist natsiy. [trans. from English]. Vydavnytstvo Tempora, Kyiv. 304 s. (in Ukrainian).

Smith A.D., 1994, Natsionana identychnist. [trans. from English]. Vydavnytstvo Osnovy, Kyiv. 224 s. (in Ukrainian).

Yakhtenfuks M., Kolyer-Kokh B. (2007). Uryaduvannya ta stvorennya instytutiv. Yevropeyska intehratsiya. [trans. from German]. Vydavnychyy dim «Kyievo-Mohylyanska akademiya», Kyiv. S 9–29 (in Ukrainian).