METAPHORICAL INSTANTIATION OF IDIOMATIC EXPRESSIONS IN MODERN POLITICAL DISCOURSE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/gph2024.850-851.54-63

Keywords:

critical discourse analysis, idiomatic expression, schema induction, schematicity, instantiation, conceptual metaphor

Abstract

The present paper is a study of English idiomatic expressions denoting cooperation in terms of Cognitive Linguistic Critical Discourse Analysis, which is herein referred to as a form of applied cognitive linguistics that investigates the links between language, cognition and social action in contexts of political communication. The methodological underpinnings involve principles of Critical Discourse Analysis proper, such as analysis of ideology (a system of values and/or ideas that shape and are shaped by discourse), framing (the way language and discourse shape how individuals or groups interpret and understand certain events, values or ideas), pragmatic inference (understanding intended meaning), lexical choices (words or phrases employed to convey a certain meaning), and discourse strategies (the conscious selection and use of language to achieve specific goals in communication). The cognitive linguistic dimension of the survey relies on the principles of schema induction and hierarchical schematic modeling of the idiomatic expressions under analysis. It is argued that meaning in context, instantiated by an idiomatic expression, is a schematic representation on two distinct conceptual levels: the dynamic, provided for by mental spaces, and the static, realized by frames, conceptual domains, and image schemas. A case study to verify this hypothesis was performed on the idiom stand shoulder to shoulder, and its findings were then employed to exemplify the extended cognitive structure of the idiomatic expressions, such as play ball, build bridges, in concert, hitch horses together, on the same page, close ranks, sing from the same hymn sheet, and it takes two to tango

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Yurii KOVALIUK, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

    PhD, Associate Professor,

    Assistant Professor of the Department of English

    Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

  • Myroslava KOVALIUK, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

    PhD, Associate Professor,

    Assistant Professor of the Department of English

    Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

References

Boers, F. (2014). Idioms and phraseology. In J. R. Taylor, & J. Littlemore (Eds.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 185–202). Bloomsbury Academic.

Deignan, A. (2006). The grammar of linguistic metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch, & S. Th. Gries (Eds.). Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 106-122). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895.106

Evans, V. (2007). Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.

Halliday, M. A., & Matthiessen, Ch. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771

Hart, C. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: toward a theoretical framework. Critical Discourse Studies, 5 (2), 91–106. https://doi:10.1080/17405900801990058

Hart, C. (2024). Ten Lectures in Cognitive Linguistics: Cognitive Critical Discourse Analysis. Brill.

Kovaliuk, Yu. (2022). Idioms in Cognitive Linguistics: Is It All about Conceptual Metaphor Theory? British and American Studies Journal, 28, 287-299. https://doi:10.35923/BAS.28.29

Kovaliuk, Yu. (2024). Connecting Idioms and Metaphors: Where Cognitive Linguistics Meets Cognitive Stylistics. British and American Studies Journal, 30, 157-170. https://doi:10.35923/BAS.30.15

Kovaliuk, Yu. (2024). Idiomatyka anhliys’koyi movy: elektronni dani ta kontseptual’ne znannya: monohrafiya [The study of idioms in English: electronic data and conceptual knowledge]. Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University Press.

Kovalyuk, Yu. (2019). Idioms in Action: A Case of Conceptual Metaphor Theory vs. Blending Theory. Advanced Education, 6(13), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.143104

Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127

Kövecses, Z. (2023). Metaphor and Discourse: A View from Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 170-184). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/430414

Langhacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001

The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available at: https://www.englishcorpora.org/coca/

van Dijk, T.A. (2002). Ideology: Political discourse and cognition. In P. Chilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.). Politics as text and talk (pp. 203–238). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4

Downloads


Abstract views: 7

Published

2025-01-29

How to Cite

METAPHORICAL INSTANTIATION OF IDIOMATIC EXPRESSIONS IN MODERN POLITICAL DISCOURSE. (2025). Germanic Philology. Journal of Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, 850-851, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.31861/gph2024.850-851.54-63

Similar Articles

1-10 of 120

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.