PROSPECTS OF APPLICATION OF LORAWAN TECHNOLOGY IN PRECISION AGRICULTURE TASKS IN THE CARPATHIAN REGION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/biosystems2025.01.171Keywords:
LoRaWAN, precision agriculture, LPWAN, Precarpathian region, soil acidity, wireless sensors, IoT, agricultural monitoring, autonomous sensorsAbstract
The present study reviews current trends and applications of LoRaWAN technology in precision agriculture. It provides examples from global practice and assesses the prospects for its adaptation to the conditions of Ukraine’s Precarpathian region. The research is based on a detailed analysis of a wide range of sources, including international scientific publications, practical case studies of LoRaWAN network deployments in the agricultural sector of various countries, and successful initiatives for digitalizing agriculture. Special attention is paid to the advantages of LoRaWAN over other technologies—particularly its long range, low energy consumption, ease of network deployment, and the ability to create private IoT infrastructures. The study offers a comparative analysis of LoRaWAN’s technical characteristics against other popular wireless solutions on the market, including NB-IoT, Sigfox, Wi-Fi, and LTE-M, taking into account factors such as communication range, energy efficiency, throughput, data reliability, and the economic feasibility of their use in rural areas, especially in mountainous and foothill regions. Particular focus is given to the agro-ecological and climatic conditions of the Precarpathian region—its topography and soil characteristics (high acidity, heterogeneity)—which determine the specifics of implementing precision agriculture there. It has been shown that the deployment of LoRaWAN networks is an optimal solution for effective soil-acidity monitoring, enabling timely and accurate responses to environmental changes, conserving resources, and increasing crop yields. A typical architecture of an IoT-based agricultural monitoring system is presented, comprising sensor devices (soil-moisture, pH, and temperature sensors), data-transmission gateways, and cloud platforms for data storage, processing, and user interaction to support agronomic data analysis and real-time farm management. The system’s design and operating principles are described in detail, supported by figures and comparative tables illustrating the benefits of LoRaWAN versus other similar technologies. Practical recommendations for deploying LoRaWAN networks in the Precarpathian region are provided. Based on the review and analysis, it is concluded that implementing LoRaWAN technology represents a promising, economically and technologically justified solution that can foster the sustainable development of the region’s agricultural sector, improve its environmental performance, and enhance the competitiveness of local producers on both Ukrainian and international markets.
References
1. 555tv. (2025). Coverage Map of 4G/3G Mobile GSM Operators in Ukraine. Retrieved June 11, 2025, from https://555tv.com.ua/uk/karta-pokrytiya-4g-3g-operatorov-ukrainy
2. Aernouts, M., Singh, R., & Weyn, M. (2020). Leveraging LoRaWAN Technology for Precision Agriculture in Greenhouses. Sensors, 20(7), 1827. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20071827
3. Bicamumakuba, E., Habineza, E., Samsuzzaman, M. N. R., & Chung, S.-O. (2025). IoT-enabled LoRaWAN gateway for monitoring and predicting spatial environmental parameters in smart greenhouses: A review. Precision Agriculture and Sustainable Technologies, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22765/pastj.20250003
4. Bilous, O. S. (2017). Automated greenhouse climate control systems. Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology, 5(1), 40-43. https://doi.org/10.32919/uesit.2017.01.40-43
5. Choo, J., Yoon, J., Ji, M., & Jang, M. (2019). LoRa-based Visual Monitoring Scheme for Agriculture IoT. IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS.2019.8706100
6. Codeluppi, G., Cilfone, A., Davoli, L., & Ferrari, G. (2020). LoRaFarM: A LoRaWAN-based smart farming modular IoT architecture. Sensors, 20(7), 2028. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20072028
7. Davydiuk, G. V., Shkarivska, L. I., Klymenko, I. I., Dovbash, N. I., & Demianyuk, O. S. (2022). Ecological and agrochemical assessment of agro-landscapes in Ivano-Frankivsk region. Agroecological Journal, (1). https://doi.org/10.33730/2077-4893.1.2022.255188
8. Jooby. (2023). Comparing IoT Gateway Protocols: WiFi, LoRaWAN, and Zigbee. Retrieved May 2025, from https://store.jooby.eu/comparing-iot-gateway-protocols-wifi-lorawan-and-zigbee/
9. Levchenko, P., Bankov, D., Khorov, E., & Lyakhov, A. (2022). Performance Comparison of NB-Fi, Sigfox, and LoRaWAN Sensors. Sensors, 22(24), 9633. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249633
10. LoRa Alliance. (2020). Why LoRaWAN is the Logical Choice for Crop Production Monitoring Solutions. https://lora-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/LA_WhitePaper_SmartAg_0520_v2.pdf
11. Minew. (2025). LoRaWAN Range: How Far Can It Reach & How to Maximize Its Coverage. Retrieved June 11, 2025, from https://www.minew.com/lorawan-range-overview/
12. Nebra Ltd. (2023). LoRa® Technology Revolutionises Agriculture: A Case Study (FarmX). Retrieved June 2025, from https://www.nebra.com/pages/agriculture
13. Nowatzki, J. (2021). Basics of LoRa Technology for Crop and Livestock Management. NDSU Agriculture Extension. Retrieved May 2025, from https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/extension/publications/basics-lora-technology-crop-and-livestock-management
14. Trackpac. (2025). Smart Agriculture IoT Sensors | LoRaWAN Farm Monitoring Solutions. Retrieved June 11, 2025, from https://trackpac.io/sensors/lorawan-smart-agriculture/
15. Zaitsev, Yu. O., Gunchak, M. V., & Romanova, S. A. (2022). Soil fertility status of Chernivtsi region. Agroecological Journal, (4). https://doi.org/10.33730/2077-4893.4.2022.273250